Rendering of the Fleet Street Landfill Project that is scheduled to begin in Canada in July 2005.
Notwithstanding Episode 2F
19 of a popular, long-running
cartoon series (Lisa
Simpson's perpetual motion
machine), the first law of thermodynamics
is difficult to disobey. You simply
cannot get more energy out of a
system compared to the energy that
you put in.
Based in Saskatoon, Solar Hydrogen
Energy Corporation (SHEC Labs) has
recently constructed and demonstrated
a Dry Fuel Hydrogen Generation
System that is powered primarily by
sunlight-focusing mirrors. The system
comprises a solar mirror array and
advanced solar concentrator and shutter
system, and two thermo-catalytic
reactors to convert methane, carbon
dioxide, and water into hydrogen.
SHEC has designed and constructed a
solar hydrogen generation system that,
when utilizing sunlight, appears to
deliver more energy than it receives.
Demonstration unit.
Why produce hydrogen?
The current market for hydrogen is
approximately 42 billion kg per year
and growing, and is used primarily in
ammonia fertilizer manufacturing, for
hydrogenation in the food and beverage
industry, and in petroleum refining
to reduce the sulphur content of fossil
fuels.
Hydrogen is also an energy carrier
and is recognized by many as the fuel
of the future. When hydrogen is consumed
by a fuel cell, its only significant
emissions are water and heat. A
clean source of hydrogen will lead to
energy self-sufficiency and clean air
and clean water.
Traditional hydrogen production
More than 95% of hydrogen produced
today is by the Steam Methane
Reformation (SMR) of fossil fuels
such as oil, coal, and natural gas, a
process that liberates massive amounts
of carbon dioxide and other pollutants
to the atmosphere. The SMR process
provides a net energy loss of 30 to 35%
when converting methane into hydrogen
since a great deal of fossil energy
or electrical power is required to operate
the process. Hydrogen is also produced
by electrolysis, a process that
uses electricity to convert water into
hydrogen and oxygen. Although electrolysis
itself can be quite efficient in
converting electricity into hydrogen,
the electricity used for electrolysis is
often primarily generated from fossil
fuels. Therefore, traditional hydrogen
production methods result in a net
increase in air pollution and are highly
inefficient from an energy conversion
perspective.
The value proposition for
solar hydrogen
Solar hydrogen production provides
a net energy gain when converting
methane into hydrogen since the energy
used to drive the process is from the
sun. Since SMR is not typically costeffective
at small to moderate production
levels, SHEC's technology is particularly
attractive for smaller and distributed
hydrogen production. The
environmental benefits of generating
hydrogen using renewable energy
include significant greenhouse gas
reductions, and the reduction of smog
precursors, acid gases, and mercury as
a result of reduced local need for oil,
coal, and natural gas.
To add even greater value, the
process has the ability to use a renewable
source of methane and carbon
dioxide, such as biogas from municipal
wastewater plants and landfill gas.
Renewable methane generated from
biomass results in no net increase of
carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere
when the methane is converted
into hydrogen by SHEC's solar hydrogen
generator.
Technology and process description
The unit produces hydrogen with
solar energy as the primary energy
input and has the following general
chemistry:
Methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide
(CO2) are reacted to form hydrogen
gas (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO):
The carbon monoxide is reacted
with water to produce more hydrogen
and carbon dioxide:
Carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane
gas (CH4) are fed into a reactor heated
by a solar mirror array. The intermediate
products from Reaction 1 feed into
a water gas shift reactor (WGSR), controlled
at near atmospheric pressure.
The resulting gas stream is H2 and CO2
and is saturated with water.
Solar energy provides the driving
force for the endothermic Reaction 1.
A water cooled iris dilates to control
the amount of radiant energy directed
to Reaction 1. Reaction 2 is exothermic
and requires cooling to maintain
the optimum temperature.
Gas Production
SHEC’s solar hydrogen generator
has now operated for approximately
1,200 hours with no noticeable coking
or degradation of the catalysts.
Hydrogen production is near the theoretical
maximum at approximately
66% in the product gas stream with a
98.2% mol conversion of the feed
methane. The estimated maximum
hydrogen production with the unit is
approximately 3,500 kg per year with
minor modifications to the operating
pressure and reactor configuration and
an increase in the solar mirror area.
Energy Balance
The system does not produce more
energy than it receives. It does, however,
produce more energy in the form of
hydrogen than the energy input in the
form of methane.
When energy is converted from one
form to another, a great deal of energy
is typically lost (i.e. 10 kW of methane
produces approximately 3 kW of electricity
in a reciprocating engine). With
the SHEC process, there are two
sources of hydrogen (methane, CH4
and water, H2O). The process of SHEC
Labs uses ‘free’ solar energy to produce
hydrogen from both methane and
water.
In bulk terms, every 1 m3 of
methane feed produces approximately
3.9 m3 of hydrogen in the process. Put
in common energy terms at 1 bar pressure
and 25°C, 1 m3 of methane equals
approximately 40 MJ of thermal energy
and 3.9 m3 of hydrogen equals
approximately 45.7 MJ of thermal
energy, which is a net energy gain of
over 14% for the demonstration unit.
Considering the total energy (from
the sun and from the methane), the
overall energy balance has a less than
100% conversion efficiency and obeys
the laws of thermodynamics. In fact
the SHEC system is quite inefficient at
present in that a great deal of the solar
energy is lost in the form of heat. And
since we know nothing is free, this heat
loss translates into additional cost for
the solar mirror array. A few well
placed heat exchangers and some
added insulation will help reduce the
amount of heat loss and allow more of
the mirror area to be dedicated to driving
the chemical reactions.
Controls system for the demonstration unit.
Cost analyses
Cost analyses and models have
been prepared based on the use of the
various feed gases (i.e. landfill gas,
natural gas, flare gas, etc.) and based
on empirical data for the cost of the
demonstration unit, current gas production,
and current size of the solar
array. The cost analyses show that the
hydrogen production costs based on
using landfill gas are lower than traditional
hydrogen production methods
that use natural gas. It is important to
note that the overall cost competitiveness
of hydrogen extends beyond
hydrogen production to hydrogen compression,
storage, and distribution. The
cost models are currently being
expanded to include these elements
and involve some innovative hydrogen
distribution cost savings.
What’s next?
The next stage of development is
anticipated to be a commercial-scale
demonstration at a landfill gas site in
Canada using 40,000 kg per year
hydrogen production modules. This
one project (a small-to-medium sized
landfill gas project) will prevent more
than 1.6 million tonnes of carbon dioxide
equivalent (CO2e) from entering
the atmosphere over the next twenty
years and will significantly improve
local air quality and reduce smog.
The next generation of solar hydrogen
involves direct water splitting
with only water as the primary feed
component. According to SHEC, six
of the ten steps needed for this
process are already integrated into the
current system.
Conclusion
Hydrogen production from renewable
methane, such as biogas from municipal wastewater treatment plants
and landfill gas is ideally suited to
SHEC’s solar hydrogen production
system. Their solar hydrogen generator
produces hydrogen from methane and
carbon dioxide feed gases in a reactor
maintained at temperature by solar
thermal energy (directed by mirrors).
A demonstration unit indicates that
solar hydrogen generation is feasible,
and appears to be cost-competitive
with traditional methods.
And yes, it does obey the laws of
thermodynamics.
Jamie Bakos, P.Eng., is Manager of
Environmental Services with Ingenium
Group Inc. (Giffels Associates Limited)
in Toronto.
Contact e-mail: jamie.bakos@giffels.com.
See our home page on how to order your subscription. We regret we can
only accept orders from Canada.