Environmental Science & Engineering - www.esemag.com - June 2004
Comments? send them to the editor.
Curb inlets can improve service and reduce cost
By A.R. Perks and R.G. Hewitt
Some Canadian municipalities
have been installing curb inlets
for roadway storm drainage
because they are easier on bicyclists
and traffic, and less costly to
install and maintain than traditional
grated inlets. The curb inlets make it
easier for snow clearing as well – no
more damaged snowplow blades and
inlets in winter.
Curb inlets (also known as side
opening inlets) are set into the face of
the curb rather than in the road gutter
itself (see Figures 1 & 2). This means
that there are no iron grates in the traffic
lane for cars and bicyclists to avoid.
Not only is this more convenient, but
because the underlying support structure
does not have to withstand the
constant pounding of traffic, there is
less settlement and damage to the inlet
itself – not to mention the reduced
wear and tear on cars and bikes.
 |
| Figure 1
|
However, until recently, no reliable
data was available on the capacity of
the curb inlets used in Ottawa to capture
the roadway runoff, and so the
design information needed to be
updated. To overcome this problem, R.
V. Anderson Associates Limited (RVA)
and the University of Ottawa were
engaged by the City of Ottawa to assist
in developing the necessary information,
such as flow capture based on
varying road and cross fall slopes, for
designing the new inlets as part of the
City’s roadway design procedures.
RVA had previously worked on the
City’s storm sewers and design criteria,
and the University of Ottawa had previously
done research into roadway
drainage for the Ontario Ministry of
the Environment, and still possessed
the specially designed laboratory
flume (scaled down model) for testing
the standard grate inlets used by most
cities.
For the curb inlet project, the flume
(model) was set up to represent the
City’s curb inlet design at a one-half
scale, and a series of experiments was
carried out under different flow and
roadway conditions, such as road/gutter
slope, cross fall (ie. side slope) and
gutter shape to establish hydraulic
capacity.
 |
| Figure 2
|
The laboratory results clearly
showed that under most practical roadway
conditions, the curb opening inlets
have substantially less hydraulic
capacity than the standard drop inlet
gratings. The curb inlet “efficiency “ is
between 10% and 20% for most roadway
conditions. The standard inlet captures
approximately 60%-70% of the
street flows under similar conditions.
In addition, the tests showed that
the addition of a depression in the curb
at each inlet does not dramatically
improve the efficiency of the flow capture
rate.
The main factor is simply that the
City of Ottawa curb inlets are less than
1 metre in width, due to the potential
for snow and ice accumulation.
Similar curb inlets in the US, where
curb opening inlets are more widely
used, are in the range of 2-5 metres in
width along the
curb. This width is
required to create
sufficient hydraulic
“draw” to turn the
flow in the gutter
into the curb opening
inlet.
For the City’s
narrow design,
under all but the
flattest street slopes
(i.e. less than 0.5% - 1% slope), the
gutter flow just by-passes the inlets.
However, when installed at low
points or sumps, the curb opening
inlets act in a different way, as basic
orifices or broad crested weirs. Then,
their capacity increases under the
hydraulic head available, and they
behave comparably to the standard
grate inlets.
The resulting problem is that using
typical inlet spacing derived for standard
grated inlets, the street gutters
will be forced to carry significantly
more flow, and potential for flooding
will exist at the next low spot in the
road, for example. While the problem
may not manifest itself for many years
along a given street, eventually a storm
will overtax the system and create
either traffic or flooding problems.
The City of Ottawa updated its
design standards and overland flow
routes to accommodate the new data.
Other municipalities should also
update their drainage design standards
to allow for the design of curb inlets
based on road slope, cross fall, gutter
shape, spacing and lateral spread.
In addition, municipalities might
consider wider inlets, using upstream
flaring and/or gutter depressions to
maximize capture, and be especially
cautious on steeply sloping streets
where unintended ponding might
occur at low points. Additionally, overland
flow routes may need to be provided
at these locations.
A.R. Perks, P.Eng., FEIC, is Director,
R.V. Anderson Associates Limited in
Ottawa.
Contact e-mail: aperks@rvanderson.com.
R.G. Hewitt, P.Eng.,
is Director, Infrastructure Services,
City of Ottawa.
See our home page on how to order your subscription. We regret we can
only accept orders from Canada and the United States.