Environmental Science & Engineering - www.esemag.com - June 2004
Comments? send them to the editor.

Niagara leads the country in source protection planning

Figure 1: The NWQPS study area.


Figure 2: The relationship between vision, goals, objectives and actions hierarchy.
In late 2001, the Regional Municipality of Niagara (Niagara Region), Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA), and Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE), consulted to consider ways to more effectively manage Niagara’s water resources. All parties agreed that to properly protect the area’s water, a more integrated approach would be required that took into consideration all jurisdictional levels. To this end, the three principals commissioned a study in August 2002 to develop Niagara’s Water Quality Protection Strategy (NWQPS).

The consortium of MacViro Consultants, CH2M HILL Canada, and Philips Engineering, along with eight specialist firms, including Lura Consulting (which completed the community engagement component), worked together with area stakeholders to produce the strategy in only 14 months, releasing it in October 2003.

The purpose of NWQPS was to develop the foundation for a comprehensive water protection strategy for all watersheds within Niagara. The NWQPS is an integrated, multi-jurisdictional plan that guides the respective authorities on how best to protect and manage water-dependent resources. It was organized into six mutually supported themes: human health, natural environment, property risk and assessment, recreation, agriculture, and commerce.

Strategies involved intensive data gathering, including over 1,000 data items, comprising reports, maps, databases, and general information from 14 area municipalities and over 30 formal agencies and watershed groups. Based on this information, an assessment was conducted of the sensitivity and value of the area’s water resources, as well as their potential ‘stressors’ such as sources of contamination, flooding, water taking, etc.

The understanding gained from the study area characterization was subsequently used to develop the management strategy. This part of the work involved significant consultation with area stakeholders to develop a prioritized action plan, comprised of over 400 area-wide and locally-specific activities organized into 11 focussed Action Programs, to address core issues related to water quantity and quality management.

Study area
Figure 1 shows that the study area encompasses a number of watersheds and subwatersheds that discharge flow to Lake Erie, Lake Ontario, and the Niagara River. There are a total of 145 primary subwatersheds within the study area. These watershed areas, with a total drainage area of 2,424 km, fall within three municipal jurisdictions, including the Region of Niagara, the City of Hamilton and Haldimand County.

Strategy hierarchy
A number of watershed issues were grouped into six themes. The NWQPS itself was structured around a set of actions, organized by programs that individually do not specifically address any one goal but in combination were developed to achieve the respective objectives, goals, and vision. Programs are made up of policy reviews, capital works projects, and studies that are designed to address the issues on a Region-wide basis and on a Local Management Areas/smaller subwatershed scale. These actions are considered mutually supporting to fulfill the respective theme-based objectives, goals, and vision. Figure 2 illustrates the relationship between vision, goals, objectives, and actions hierarchy.

Action programs
The initial long list of issues was developed in accordance with the sixtheme concept. A summary of the Action Programs that cohesively address the core issues include:
Strategy implementation
Before implementation could begin, a framework needed to be developed that ensures that the effort continues to meet the strategy’s goals. From an extensive review of other jurisdictions, it was found that several types of implementation frameworks are available. Further investigation indicated that those that are successful tend to reflect Public Sector governance with substantial stakeholder involvement. Key elements considered in the development of an implementation framework for the NWQPS included: Subsequently, a near-term implementation framework was prepared which recognized the links between the Region of Niagara, the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority, and watershed-area municipalities.

Communication
Throughout the study, public consultation was a significant part of the strategy development and included five advisory meetings with stakeholders and two formal public meetings. A Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) was also formed as part of the study’s public consultation process. The goal for CAC was to ensure citizen engagement in water quality and quantity issues.

The communication process will continue in the implementation of the strategy. A key component of the Implementation Team’s monitoring activity will be to report on the status of the watersheds to demonstrate the changes arising from the implementation of the NWQPS. An integral component of this process will be public education/awareness and involvement to develop an open information sharing process.

Gauging the success of the NWQPS is important to the Niagara Region, its residents, and its neighbours. It is for this reason that a template for a Regional Report Card was developed. The report cards are meant to demonstrate relative levels of improvement or degradation in the six theme areas developed as part of the NWQPS. In order to make these comparisons, baseline monitoring will need to be established for each of the monitoring areas. Following this initial monitoring, grades can be assigned based on the level of improvement in each area.

Periodic updating of the strategy will be required in order to incorporate the findings of the monitoring plan and to address new approaches which arise. Recommendations were made that the strategy be updated on a fiveyear basis.

Integration of NWQPS with provincial planning framework
NWQPS is a significant undertaking that will address the need for source protection planning recommended in Part One and Part Two reports of The Walkerton Inquiry and anticipated as a legislative requirement by the Province. It is important that the NWQPS meets the source protection planning requirements and, at the same time, be implemented through a framework that meets the specific requirements of the Niagara Region, area municipalities, and other key stakeholders.

In April 2003, the provincial government’s Advisory Committee on Watershed-based Source Protection Planning released their final report entitled, Protecting Ontario’s Drinking Water: Toward a Watershed based Source Protection Planning Framework.

NWQPS essentially, is the foundation for a Source Protection Plan. The plan has been developed, however, to this point, without the benefit of the province’s Source Protection Planning Framework. The implementation framework provides a structure that is in conformance with the requirements put forward in the province’s Source Protection Planning Framework and will ensure that the recommendations that were put forward in the two Walkerton Inquiry reports are addressed.

NWQPS priorities
Implementation of the NWQPS is now being directed by an Implementation Committee that has the mandate to initiate the implementation priorities and to determine the ultimate framework structure that will provide for the longterm management of the Strategy. In the proposed Framework for Implementation, it is suggested that an Implementation Team be set up to conduct the respective Action Programs that support the NWQPS.

Specifically, the Implementation Team will be responsible for the direct actions being implemented directly as a result of the NWQPS. In addition, the Implementation Team will need to be informed by a host of indirect actions, which are, or will be, undertaken by other stakeholders across Niagara.

Some examples of important direct actions include: Some equally important indirect actions include: Implementation of the NWQPS will continue in 2004 and into 2005, with many actions items being undertaken and many more stakeholders becoming involved to ensure that the vision of Water for Life becomes a reality.
Contributing authors include Mario Conetta, MacViro Consultants Inc. (905-475-7270),
Tom Mahood, CH2M HILL Canada Limited (519-579-3501,)
Ronald B. Scheckenberger, Philips Engineering Ltd. (905-335-2353),
Bob Steele, Region of Niagara (905-685-4225) and
Sandra Znajda, Lura Consultants (416-644-1803).


See our home page on how to order your subscription. We regret we can only accept orders from Canada and the United States.