Environmental Science & Engineering - www.esemag.com - September 2002
Comments? send them to the editor.
Understanding requirements of ISO/IEC 17025
By J.E.J. (Ned) Gravel,
P.Eng.,
Canadian Association
for Environmental Analytical
Laboratories
ISO/IEC 17025 is a standard that
sets out the specific requirements
to be met by laboratories wishing
to achieve the production of
competent results as a matter
of course. These requirements
were developed by groups of
laboratory experts from
around the world over the
course of 30 years. From the
first, laboratory competence
has been the paramount consideration.
In today's world, recognition
of such competence generally
requires that laboratories
which have implemented the
requirements of the standard
obtain accreditation. Accreditation
involves assessment
and, like all audit-associated
activities, assessment of technical
competence requires trained assessors
to deliver these assessments. Assessors
must be fully cognisant of each
of the requirements in the standard.
During the course of their work, assessors
will often encounter situations
where they are forced to defend particular
requirements to a laboratory
seeking accreditation and, while they
understand the specific requirement
under discussion, they may not be able
to clearly articulate why such a requirement
exists, in the first place.
That is to say - they may not be able to
identify the principles which underlie
the stated requirement.
At the same time, a laboratory's
blind adherence to each of the requirements
of the standard, while better than
no system at all, is not an approach
which instills confidence in ability to
produce competent results. Nor is it
the best approach to use in acquiring
recognition of such competence.
Finally, ISO 9000:2000 is now
well-known and respected around the
world as a standard which today aims
at allowing conforming organisations
to implement a "model for excellence."
While some may see this aim as a very
ambitious one for any organisation, the
standard effectively breaks down the
elements which an organisation can
readily achieve in their implementation
of such a model. One of the great
strengths of ISO 9000:2000 is its clear
basis on principles which can be easily
articulated and understood.
Those who live and work in the world
of laboratories also adhere to specific
principles, but these have not been articulated
in one collection. Such principles
would provide a clearly understood
basis for the requirements of the
standard which most directly impacts
laboratory operations.
The objective of this article is to provide
a listing of the principles behind
ISO/IEC 17025. These can be used by
laboratories to better appreciate individual
requirements of the standard. The
article can also be used by assessors, in
understanding how or why a specific
requirement can help (or perhaps hinder)
a laboratory to implement the processes
required for the recognition of their competence.
From study of the standard and its
impact on laboratory operations over the
course of the last nine years, the following
principles are considered to be the
main forces behind all of the requirements
of ISO/IEC 17025:
- Capacity
- Exercise of Responsibility
- Scientific Method
- Objectivity of Results
- Impartiality of Conduct
- Traceability of Measurement
- Repeatability of Test
- Transparency of Process
Capacity
Environmental laboratories must
have the resources (people with the required
skills and knowledge, the environment
with the required facilities and
equipment, the quality control, and the
procedures) in order to undertake the
work and produce competent results.
Exercise of responsibility
Persons in the organisation should
have the authority to execute specific
functions within the overall scope of
work - and the organisation can
demonstrate accountability for
the results of the work.
Scientific method
Work carried out by the organisation
must be based on
accepted scientific approaches,
preferably consensus-based,
and any deviations from accepted
scientific approaches
must be substantiated in a manner
considered generally acceptable
by experts in that
field.
Objectivity of results
Results produced within the
scope of work of the organisation,
must be mainly based on measurable
or derived quantities.
Subjective test results should be produced
only by persons deemed qualified
to do so and such results should be noted
as being subjective, or known by experts
in that field of testing to be mainly subjective.
Impartiality of conduct
The pursuit of competent results
through the use of generally accepted
scientific approaches is the primary and
overriding influence on the work of persons
executing tests - all other influences
should be considered secondary and not
permitted to take precedence.
Traceability of measurement
The results produced, within the
scope of work of the laboratory, must
be based on a recognised system of
measurement that derives from accepted,
known quantities (SI system) or
other intrinsic or well-characterised devices
or quantities.
The chain of comparison of measurement
between these accepted, known
quantities or intrinsic devices or quantities,
and the device providing objective
results, must be unbroken for the transfer
of measurement characteristics, including
uncertainty, for the whole of the
measurement chain.
Repeatability of test
The test which produced the objective
results, will produce the same results,
within accepted deviations during
subsequent testing, and within the constraints
of using the same procedures,
equipment and persons used during a
previous execution of the test.
Transparency of process
The processes existent within the
laboratory producing the objective results,
should be open to internal and external
scrutiny, so that factors which may
adversely affect the laboratory's pursuit
of objective results based on scientific
method, can be readily identified and
mitigated.
Conclusion
These eight principles may not cover
every aspect of every requirement in the
standard, but they are broad enough to
allow persons working in laboratories
to appreciate the reasons behind most
of the individual requirements. They
may also allow assessors to use their
professional judgement in assessing the
conformance of a laboratory to each of
the requirements within the standard.
See our home page on how to order your subscription. We regret we can
only accept orders from Canada and the United States.