Environmental Science & Engineering - www.esemag.com - September 2003
Comments? send them to the editor.
Stormwater management could combat West Nile Virus
By R. Dale Downey, P.Eng., Cumming Cockburn Limited
Can stormwater management
ponds be designed to combat
the proliferation of the West
Nile Virus? The answer is yes,
with a little help from Mother Nature.
There is a public perception that
stormwater management ponds provide
abundant habitat for the propagation
of mosquitoes. Current research
suggests these facilities can and do
provide suitable habitat; however, there
is little evidence to support them as
significant breeding grounds for mosquitoes.
Recent field observations in
Canada and the United States conclude
that constructed wetlands and
stormwater management ponds actually
pose a low risk in spreading the
West Nile Virus since the mosquito
species that are found in wetlands and
stormwater management ponds tend
not to be the variety that carry the West
Nile Virus.
Of the 74 known species of mosquitoes
in Canada, the West Nile Virus has
been detected in 10 species. Not all
species are found in all parts of Canada
(57 species are found in Ontario)
though field tests suggest that less than
1% of mosquitoes are likely to be
infected with the West Nile Virus.
Further evidence states that if an
infected mosquito bites you, then you
have a 0.3% chance of developing mild
symptoms. These low percentages may
appear insignificant but substantial
efforts are presently underway within
Canada and the US to manage the
spread of the virus to humans and animals.
The focus of this article is to report
on the type of measures being implemented
by water resource engineers
and municipalities in the design, operation
and maintenance of stormwater
management ponds to help mitigate
the spread of the West Nile Virus within
our communities.
Current research demonstrates that
only female mosquitoes can spread the
virus and the most important action we
can take to control mosquito populations
is to eliminate or treat the highrisk
mosquito breeding sites within our
urban communities. Birds serve as the
host for the virus. The mosquito first
acquires the infection by feeding on an
infected bird and the virus is then
transmitted when the female mosquito
bites a person or animal. There is no
evidence to support the view that the
virus can be spread naturally from one
person to another or from birds and
mammals to a person.
Which mosquito species actually
transmit the West Nile Virus to people
and animals? Scientists don’t know for
sure; however, many believe that the
virus is primarily associated with
Culex mosquitoes. They are commonly
known as the northern house mosquito,
are widespread and have a flight
range of less than one kilometre. This
means that if you are bitten by one of
these mosquitoes, then it likely
hatched nearby. Water that is stagnant
for more than three to five days, high
in organics, within areas of dense vegetation,
and free of predators, is a very
attractive habitat to the female mosquitoes
and well-known as a high risk site,
particularly from May to September
when the mosquito larvae are hatched.
We are all well aware that the adult
mosquitoes are most active just after
sunset.
There is also uncertainty on how
the virus survives our cold winters.
Some scientists believe it could be carried
inside migrating birds or remain
dormant in hibernating mosquitoes.
On May 13, 2003, Ontario Premier
Ernie Eves announced new provincial
standards for larviciding as part of the
government’s $20 Million commitment
to combat the West Nile Virus.
The Premier’s science–based and
multi-tasked action plan was developed
from recent experiences of jurisdictions
within the United States such
as Illinois, New Jersey and New York. The provincial action plan will provide
funding to support all costs of purchasing
larvicide for use in municipalities
in Ontario. In response to this initiative,
Ontario municipalities have
assessed the risk within their communities
and approved by-law amendments
and new regulations to eliminate
or treat mosquito larvae production
areas.
Methoprene is the larvicide of
choice in many municipalities in
Ontario. It comes in slow-release pellet-
like formulations and is administered
when the mosquito is in the larvae
stage of development. It has been
approved by both the provincial and
federal governments and is considered
safe for humans and the environment.
Stormwater management ponds
represent the final stage of a traditional
three-stage stormwater management
treatment train designed to control and
treat the stormwater runoff draining
from urban developments. These
ponds are an end-of-pipe solution,
which means they are located at the
end or outlet of the stormwater collection
network. The most visible portion
of the stormwater collection system
are catchbasins, which intercept the
water on our roads and deposit it into
the underground storm sewer pipes.
The ponds are designed to: capture
the excess stormwater to prevent
flooding downstream; detain and slow
the rate of discharge to help reduce
stream channel erosion and habitat
degradation; and to capture and hold
sediment and other pollutants that are
washed from the streets and driveways
and into the storm sewers. Recent
advances in the design of these facilities
have also enhanced their aesthetics
and property value within the community.
Most new draft plans of development
for residential, commercial and
industrial communities in Ontario
include a stormwater management
pond. Many municipalities have developed
guidelines on the proper design,
operation and maintenance and monitoring
of stormwater ponds; however,
many of these guidelines are adopted
from the Stormwater Management
Planning and Design Manual published
by the Ontario Ministry of the
Environment and updated in March
2003. Mosquito abatement measures
within the stormwater management
ponds are not addressed in the current
version of the Design Manual.
There are two traditional types of
stormwater management ponds:
Detention Pond (dry) and Retention
Pond (wet). Recent advances in
stormwater management have created
a combination facility, known as a
Hybrid Pond (combined wet and dry
plus wetland). A detention (dry) pond
is designed to capture stormwater discharged
from the storm sewer and
release it at a controlled discharge to a
designated outlet over a minimum of
24 hours. It is often referred to as an
extended detention pond. Most of the
time the pond is dry. Its primary function
is flood control and erosion control.
They were very common in the
1980s; however, many municipalities
now discourage their use.
A retention (wet) pond is the same
as above except it contains a permanent
pool of water and its primary
function is water quality treatment,
erosion control and flood control. As
the name implies the pond always contains
a pool of water. This pool assists
in the removal of pollutants normally
associated with urban stormwater
runoff.
A hybrid pond consists of a wet
pond element, an extended detention
component and a wetland element connected
in series. It provides enhanced
water quality treatment capabilities.
Most municipalities desire this type of
pond design and sometimes add accessories
such as fountains to enhance its
performance and augment the concentration
of dissolved oxygen for a
healthy fish habitat.
Stormwater management ponds
have proven to be a valuable tool to
abate some of the water quality pollutants
and hydrologic side effects normally
associated with the creation of
our modern urban communities. A further
refinement in the design of these
facilities can help to control the spread
of the West Nile Virus by eliminating
the high-risk mosquito-breeding habitat.
The following design features have
been or are in the process of being
adopted by Cumming Cockburn
Limited in the design of stormwater
management facilities in Ontario:
- Gravity flow of water throughout
the facility. Pumps and potential pump
failure are avoided. The hydraulic
grade line is examined to ensure an
adequate downward slope from the
storm sewer outlet to the point of discharge
from the pond.
- Constant supply of fresh water to
the permanent pool in the wet or
hybrid ponds. This supply is from a
natural groundwater discharge and /or
a relatively large contributing drainage
area. Most large drainage basins have a
constant dry-weather flow discharge
from the storm sewers.
- Aerate the pond with a fountain,
where possible, to increase the concentration
of dissolved oxygen and diminish
stagnation.
- Avoid using loose riprap or concrete
formed depressions that encourage
standing water. Riprap is often
used at the outlet of storm sewers to
help dissipate the energy in the water.
Encasing the riprap or concrete chute
blocks within a sloped bed of concrete
will diminish the risk of standing
water.
- Avoid using barriers or diversions
that hold standing water.
- Upgrade stormwater management
ponds. In the 1980s and early 1990s,
many SWM ponds were designed for
flood control only (extended detention
or dry ponds). Many facilities are
being retrofitted to improve performance.
The modern facilities are
designed for flood control, water quality
treatment, erosion control, habitat
protection and include a well-planned
planting strategy of indigenous vegetation.
In many cases, this native vegetation
helps absorb the stagnant water.
- Seal the flow control structures
from stagnant water (held longer than
three days) to prevent the entry of adult
mosquitoes. Adult female mosquitoes
can enter an opening as small as 1.5
mm (1/16“). Allowances must be
made to permit easy access for dewatering
if the need arises.
- Fully submerge the inlet and outlet
pipes within the discharge control
structure to reduce the available surface
area of water for mosquitoes to
lay eggs.
- Dry detention facilities must completely
drain all standing water within
72 hours.
- Small diameter flow control orifices
can become clogged and blockage
will delay the drawdown time.
Consider an emergency flow release.
- Encourage permanent pools with a
water quality that will support the
indigenous surface feeding fish, which
feed on mosquito larvae. Introducing
non-native fish or wildlife to control
mosquitoes in ponds is not very effective
and may threaten native species.
- Control the growth and density of
emergent and pond-edge vegetation
within the shorelines or safety shelves
along the perimeter of permanent
pools so the mosquito predators are not
inhibited or excluded from pond
edges. This will enable the indigenous
fish to swim between plant bases.
These areas must be accessible for
periodic maintenance and inspection.
- Maintain a depth in excess of 1.2 m
within the permanent pools to help
prohibit the growth of invasive emergent
vegetation such as cattails.
Emergent vegetation provides mosquito
larvae with shelter from predators
and increases nutrient availability. The
pond edges below the water surface are
to be as steep and uniform as possible
to discourage dense plant growth,
which would become a favourable
habitat for mosquitoes.
- An impermeable liner may be used
in areas where vegetation is not
desired.
- An all-weather access road is recommended
along at least one side of
the pond that is less than 7 m wide and
as close to the shoreline as possible. If
space permits, ponds with a shoreline-to-shoreline distance greater than 7 m
generally require access on both sides.
Dale Downey is Director, Water
Resources, Municipalities and Land
Development, for Cumming Cockburn
Limited of Richmond Hill, Ontario. Email:
ddowney@cclconsultants.com.
See our home page on how to order your subscription. We regret we can
only accept orders from Canada and the United States.