Environmental Science & Engineering - www.esemag.com - November 2004
Comments? send them to the editor.

Successful implementation of “defined-concept” design-build approach

By Vincent Nazareth, Valera Saknenko, Laura McDowell, Martin Tourangeau and James W. Lunn

Aerial view of the new Sutton Water Pollution Control Plant, showing SBR tanks, effluent equalization tank and process building.

new effluent criteria table
The new Sutton Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP), a fully automated tertiary treatment plant with a rated plant capacity of 3,412 m3/day, is located in the community of Sutton, the Town of Georgina in the Regional Municipality of York, Ontario, servicing Sutton and Jackson’s Point. The old Sutton WPCP consisted of an aeration basin, a final clarifier and an effluent polishing lagoon providing capacity for approximately 4,500 people. The final effluent was discharged to the Black River.

Construction of the new wastewater treatment plant had been contemplated by York Region since the early 1990s. In 1997, a Secondary Plan for the Community of Sutton was approved by York Region for an ultimate design population of 16,500 by the year 2016, representing an increase of 12,000 people. The Environmental Assessment process, completed in 2001, included a phased expansion approach. A preferred option would involve a Phase 1 expansion for a serviced population of 7,500 people (average daily flow of 3,412 m3/day), and Phase 2 – for 16,500 people (average daily flow of 7,510 m3/day).

New effluent criteria were developed through the Ministry of Environment and summarized in the table:

In order to shorten the project time line, York Region, in association with local private developers, decided to proceed with the project on a designbuild basis. The region retained R. V. Anderson Associates Limited (RVA) to prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP), to assist the Region with the selection of a design-build contractor.

A “Defined-Concept” design-build approach has been selected for this project. The RFP contained information about capacities and performance requirements, equipment specifications, redundancy provisions and process narrative, which allowed York Region to establish minimum design requirements, but left the selection of the specific equipment and conceptualization of the design to the proponents. This RFP also included a oneyear operation period.

Quality of the final product is one of the principal concerns with any project delivery method. However, with a design-build project, obtaining quality needs more attention through the various stages of the project. It must begin early in the selection process and it should start with the identification of bidders who are best qualified to do the work. The Sutton WPCP selection process took the following steps: Pre-Qualification, Request for Proposal, Evaluation, Interviews (as part of evaluation), Negotiation and Award.

Evaluation of the submissions was carried out by four separate individuals (two from the Region and two from the consulting team). Technical proposals were independently scored and subsequently price proposals were opened, scored and the combined scores calculated. Azurix North America (now AWS Engineers and Planners Corp.) was the successful proponent.

Construction of the new facility commenced in spring 2002 and was completed in September 2003. After a one-year operating period by AWS, the new Sutton WPCP was handed over to York Region on October 1, 2004. It was designed for a ‘Phase 1’ average daily flow of 3,412 m3/day and a peak capacity of 12,212 m3/day. The major process components of the Sutton WPCP include the following:
Close-up of one SBR tank at the Sutton WPCP.
All processes at the Sutton WPCP are controlled by a computerized Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA).

During the 12-month operation period, AWS Engineers & Planners staff were in full control of the treatment plant. Operational parameters of the various treatment processes were optimized, and training provided to York Region’s operations staff, including a period of shadowing for about four weeks.

This “Defined-Concept” Design- Build approach with a one-year operating contract has proven to be a costeffective alternative project delivery method if properly managed and administered. The one-year operating period also allows for increased integration between the owner’s operation staff and the contractor, allowing a smoother transition at handover.

Building in specific owner requirements and defining quality in the RFP are key to a successful design-build project.


Vincent Nazareth and Valera Saknenko are with R.V. Anderson Associates Limited,
Laura McDowell is with The Regional Municipality of York, and
Martin Tourangeau and James W. Lunn are with AWS Engineers & Planners Corp.
Contact e-mail: vsaknenko@rvanderson.com.


See our home page on how to order your subscription. We regret we can only accept orders from Canada.